无线通讯装置
潜在问题：手机、Wi-Fi，及其它无线装置
手机产业肇始于1980年代，起初是为美国军方所用，这些装置从未做过任何安全测试。后来手机推广到民间，业界提出低功率免检的论点—即认为手机辐射不会产生热能，使该产业几乎可说是完全不受监管。1
使用行动电话的人，暴露在明显比一般环境高出许多的射频(RF)辐射之下。原则上是因为这种装置使用时靠近头部，并直接对着脑部释放出大量能量。手机基本上就是一部无线电，发送RF讯号至远处的基地台，同时也传到您的中枢神经系统。手机会产生两种讯号：近距羽流场及远距羽流场。其中最值得关注的是近距羽流场，它产生在手机天线的10至12厘米距离之内，很容易就能穿透大脑及其它器官组织，如髋骨，人体有80%的血球是在此制造的。
大约在行动通讯打入全球市场之后20年，我们终于来到手机可能引起癌症的潜伏期的尾声，而科学证据正在显示，使用手机对人体健康极为不利。瑞典研究人员最近揭露了一则惊人消息，显示其国内基地台的架设与手机的大量使用，与人们健康的持续恶化是同时发生的。2,3 其它近期的研究中，科学家则具体指出了这些病症，有：脑肿瘤及其它癌症、4,5,6 基因突变与基因受损、7,8,9 中枢神经系统衰变、10,11,12 神经失调、13,14,15 及免疫功能障碍等。16,17,18
手机的出现，将微波从天空中带到大街上，将这强大的电磁场带到我们身边，这对人体而言是完全陌生的东西。据推测，人体会将这些能量场当作入侵的病原体，并产生一连串生化反应，并释出有害的自由基，改变血脑屏障，引发慢性炎症反应，并破坏细胞间的沟通。据信其它无线通讯装置(例如Wi-Fi)的影响也是一样，因这些装置也会辐射出与手机相同频率的微波讯号。19
1 S. Kovach, “The Hidden Dangers of Cell Phone Use,” Life Extension Magazine, August, 2009.
2 Hallberg O., “Adverse health indicators correlating with sparsely populated areas in Sweden,” Eur J Cancer Prev 16, no. 1, p. 1-6.
3 Hallberg O, Johansson O., “Apparent decreases in Swedish public health indicators after 1997-Are they due to improved diagnostics or to environmental factors?”Pathophysiology 16, no. 1, p. 43-6.
4 French PW, Penny R, Laurence JA, McKenzie DR., “Mobile phones, heat shock proteins and cancer,” Differentiation 67, no. 4-5, p. 93-7.
5 Goldsmith JR., “Epidemiologic evidence relevant to radar (microwave) effects,”Environ Health Perspect 105, no. 6, p. 1579-87.
6 Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson MK., “Use of cellular telephones and brain tumour risk in urban and rural areas,” Occup Environ Med 62, no. 6, p. 390-4.
7 Belyaev IY, Markova E, Hillert L, Malmgren LO, Persson BR., “Microwaves from UMTS/GSM mobile phones induce long-lasting inhibition of 53BP1/gamma-H2AX DNA repair foci in human lymphocytes,” Bioelectromagnetics 30, no. 2, p. 129-41.
8 Garaj-Vrhovac V, Horvat D, Koren Z., “The effect of microwave radiation on the cell genome,” Mutat Res 243, no. 2, p. 87-93.
9 Kim JY, Hong SY, Lee YM et al, “In vitro assessment of clastogenicity of mobile-phone radiation (835 MHz) using the alkaline comet assay and chromosomal aberration test,” Environ Toxicol 23, no. 3, p. 319-27.
10 Ammari M, Lecomte A, Sakly M, Abdelmelek H, de-Seze R., “Exposure to GSM 900 MHz electromagnetic fields affects cerebral cytochrome c oxidase activity,” Toxicology250, no. 1, p. 70-4.
11 Ammari M, Brillaud E, Gamez C et al., “Effect of a chronic GSM 900 MHz exposure on glia in the rat brain,” Biomed Pharmacother 62, no. 4, p. 273-81.
12 Barteri M, Pala A, Rotella S., “Structural and kinetic effects of mobile phone microwaves on acetylcholinesterase activity,” Biophys Chem 113, no. 3, p. 245-53.
13 D'Andrea JA., “Behavioral evaluation of microwave irradiation,”Bioelectromagnetics 20, Suppl 4, p. 64-74.
14 Augner C, Florian M, Pauser G, Oberfeld G, Hacker GW., “GSM base stations: short-term effects on well-being,” Bioelectromagnetics 30, no. 1, p. 73-80.
15 bdel-Rassoul G, El-Fateh OA, Salem MA et al., “Neurobehavioral effects among inhabitants around mobile phone base stations,” Neurotoxicology 28, no. 2, p. 434-40.
16 Nakamura H, Seto T, Nagase H, Yoshida M, Dan S, Ogino K., “Effects of exposure to microwaves on cellular immunity and placental steroids in pregnant rats,” Occup Environ Med 54, no. 9, p. 676-80.
17 Natarajan M, Vijayalaxmi, Szilagyi M, Roldan FN, Meltz ML., “NF-kappaB DNA-binding activity after high peak power pulsed microwave (8.2 GHz) exposure of normal human monocytes,” Bioelectromagnetics 23, no. 4, p. 271-7.
18 Salama OE, bou El Naga RM., “Cellular phones: are they detrimental?” J Egypt Public Health Assoc, 79, no. 3-4, p. 197-223.
19 S. Kovach, “The Hidden Dangers of Cell Phone Use,” Life Extension Magazine, August, 2009.
